Home › Forums › Products › Stompboxes › Ideas for future Timefactor update › Reply To: Ideas for future Timefactor update
stringrazor:
I'd like to see the AUX SW functions respond to button RELEASE to restore the MIN value, in other words, have a non-latching function.
Actually, this is what I thought they did. I was wrong and you were right.
stringrazor:
I'd like to have AUX SW parm assignments stored with a patch. They'd be infinitely more useful.
Maybe, but we thought it would be too hard to remember all the settings.
stringrazor:
I'd like to be able to map the function of at least one (the middle) on-board button switch as can be done with the AUX SW settings.
Again, we keep the main switches the same to avoid confusion. Sorry.
stringrazor:
I'd like the diatonic tracking to be more solid.
So would we – it's VERY difficult – it is a trade-off between response time and accuracy. Because these are pedals rather than rack boxes they do not have the number of controls necessary to allow a vibrato range across notes. You will have the same issue if you bend a note too far – after a certain point it will view it as a different note. To some extent, this is the nature of a diatonic shifter.